What does "good cause" refer to in the context of taking away rights?

"Good cause" in the context of taking away rights primarily relates to situations where there is a clear and immediate risk of danger to the individual or others. This concept is often used in legal and ethical discussions regarding the necessity of intervening in a person's life, particularly in cases involving developmental disabilities. The potential for harm must be substantiated and significant enough to justify limiting an individual’s rights, such as when a person's actions pose a direct threat to their safety or the safety of those around them.

While other factors, like the desire for improved quality of life or compliance with rules, might influence care decisions, they do not inherently justify the removal of an individual's rights. Insufficient funding or resources, while a significant concern in the context of care, does not constitute "good cause" for taking away rights either. Thus, the focus on risk of danger marks a critical threshold where rights may be re-evaluated due to the protection of life and safety.